Accessibility Page Navigation
Style sheets must be enabled to view this page as it was intended.
Regent's College

Chakib Bouayad

Nationality: Moroccan
Degree: MBA with Human Resource Management
Graduated: 2007

Business and Education seem to go together in London. The number of Business Education institutions in this city is high enough to explain the avant-garde position London now occupies among the world capital cities of business and finance. Yet, most students who must make the choice of which Business school to enrol in find  that a daunting task. The variety of programmes on offer is such that choice is made even more difficult, and the reputations of schools are constantly in a state of ebb and flow.

That being the situation, I decided to base my choice of which school to take on my personal experience as an educator. Top-tier schools often tend to occupy the first ten positions in ranking tables. True, but that is statistics. And statistics can be used to support any claim. Like in first league football clubs, the management allows membership only to a select few players, brands them through glamorous media campaigns, attracts business in the form of ticket and membership sales, and that way they can put a strong claim on success. Such managements have still to convince the public about the robustness of that claim by allowing more mainstream players to figure among their teams and continue to attain the same levels of success. Until that  happens, whatever sign of excellence they achieve will be ascribed to players rather than management’s skills. The analogy with Business schools should be clear.

Webster was my school of choice because it doesn’t shy away from accepting mainstream students like me alongside students with a good background in business studies and yet manages to turn that variety of input levels into academically and professionally coherent output standards. Webster does that through a faculty team whose members strive to balance teaching on the subject with training in the skills relevant to that subject. Student involvement is such that no one is left out, and when that happens to be the case –which is rare-, Webster draws that student out of the course for further advice and academic orientation. I have heard of places which expect you to know it all, or almost, before you could be offered a place.

Webster was also my school of choice because of the patience and the individual attention every student is entitled to once part of the school. Students are encouraged to express their opinion on any aspect of their life at the school, those opinions are taken into consideration, and action often follows in the form of careful changes and adjustments. Now that I am approaching the end of my programme, I can say with a lot of confidence that the value I got from my course outweighs the money I spent in connection with it.

Thank you Webster for having given me and lots of other students quality education, by quality faculty, in a quality setting ( London Regent’s ).

Page last updated 5/12/2009

"Studying International Relations at Webster Graduate School in London taught me two ways of International Relations: the academic way and the personal way...   In the academic life of International Relations, we learned and analyzed various political theories and their realization; methodologies and ways of research...   In the personal life of International Relations, we learned that it is possible for nearly all ethnicities, friends and enemies, to sit in one class-room, to listen to one professor, to share one lunch-break – suddenly we shared the same interests!  "

Bettina Lutz

Student quote